Australia’s trade is being threatened by Red Sea cargo ship attacks. Is there a plan B?

[ad_1]

Australia is 11,000 km from the Red Sea but it is not immune from attempting to move through one of the world’s busiest thoroughfares.
Since November, Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen have launched more than 20 attacks on container ships using drones, ballistic missiles, and in one case, an explosive unoccupied vessel. The attacks have come in response to the war in the Gaza Strip.

This has prompted logistics firms including Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd and Evergreen as well as the oil giant BP, to pause ship movements through a channel that carries 12 per cent of the world’s seaborne cargo, mostly between Europe and Asia and locations further south including Australia and New Zealand.

The impact has been significant, particularly for China, India, Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia as well as European countries including the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy.

How is Australia impacted by the Red Sea attacks?

While just 16 per cent of Australia’s container imports come from Europe, the supply chain between Australia and the European Union is critical for many Australians.

In 2022, Australia imported about $60 billion in products including pharmaceuticals, machinery, road vehicles, electrical and electronic equipment and medical apparatus from Europe. Much of it was shipped through the Red Sea.

A map of Africa, Europe, Asia and Australia with the Red Sea marked out.

Source: The Conversation

Over the same period, Australia exported goods valued at $23 billion to Europe. The most traded items were mineral fuels, oils and distillation products. Others included wine, fruits, grain, seeds, nickel and aluminium.

Maersk and other companies have started diverting their containers around South Africa’s Cape of Good Hope, but this much-extended route takes longer and has led to major delays, shortages and additional shipping costs.

These extra costs are most likely to be passed on to businesses and consumers. The UK is already experiencing shortages of tea, wine, meat and fish.

International pressure on the rebels

Last week Australia, the US and 11 other countries affected by the disruption issued a statement condemning the attacks as “illegal, unacceptable, and profoundly destabilising”.

“Let our message now be clear. We call for the immediate end of these illegal attacks and release of unlawfully detained vessels and crew,” it said.

It came after Australia last month turned down a request from the US to send a warship to the region, saying it needed to prioritise the Indo-Pacific.

It’s time to develop a plan B

Global disruptions have intensified in the last few years as a result of COVID-19, cyberattacks, natural disasters and geopolitical tensions. They are likely to intensify further.
Meanwhile, industrial action at Australian ports is also hurting trade. The dispute between the Maritime Union of Australia and the stevedore DP World over a new workplace deal has disrupted container terminal operations in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne and Fremantle, slowing imports of furniture, food and clothing.

To minimise the impact of all of these disruptions, businesses need to develop backup plans that can be implemented quickly.

They include diversifying supply sources, being prepared to use alternative shipping routes and onshoring critical manufacturing.
Resources ought to be allocated now and planning done in collaboration with local and international partners.
The businesses that best prepare will be those best able to ride out and gain from the next disruption.

Sanjoy Paul is an associate professor at UTS Business School of the University of Technology Sydney. Paul does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *